Screening land before an offer
You have a list and a week. Run each address, compare on developable area and residual land value rather than on lot size, and take the two that survive to a site visit.
See the feasibility model →The same analysis, applied at the four moments where being wrong is most expensive.
You have a list and a week. Run each address, compare on developable area and residual land value rather than on lot size, and take the two that survive to a site visit.
See the feasibility model →House Bill 1110 changed what a great many residential lots can hold. Civexa applies each city's own adopted rule — which differs by city — to a specific parcel and cites the ordinance.
Browse the city rules →Turn the unknowns into a commissioning list: which study, what it would settle, and what the answer changes. Unscreened layers are named so nothing is assumed clear.
See site intelligence →Build the pro forma from the programme the parcel supports rather than from a target, and see the break-even headroom on every variable that moves it.
See underwriting →Code changes. A parcel that supported one house under the old ordinance may support four or six now, and the report cites the version it read.
See regulatory intelligence →Hand over a solved envelope and the constraint geometry behind it, so the first scheme starts inside the envelope.
See the architect's view →Screen more sites than you can walk.
See the developer view →Start from a measured envelope.
See the architect view →Underwrite what the site can actually support.
See the investor view →Every property has a possibility. The question is whether you can see it.
Civexa AI helps you find out.